134a Refrigerant
07-18-2005 | 12:39 AM
#3291
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D8187C.A0FE8C47@***.net...
> You really think you may substitute "equal" for "is" in my
> statement "volume change is their new
> density"??????????????????????????? That does not make volume equal
> density, no more than an apple equals and orange. Dense!
But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
__
Steve
..
07-18-2005 | 12:39 AM
#3292
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D8187C.A0FE8C47@***.net...
> You really think you may substitute "equal" for "is" in my
> statement "volume change is their new
> density"??????????????????????????? That does not make volume equal
> density, no more than an apple equals and orange. Dense!
But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
__
Steve
..
07-18-2005 | 12:39 AM
#3293
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D8187C.A0FE8C47@***.net...
> You really think you may substitute "equal" for "is" in my
> statement "volume change is their new
> density"??????????????????????????? That does not make volume equal
> density, no more than an apple equals and orange. Dense!
But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
__
Steve
..
07-18-2005 | 12:42 AM
#3294
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Republicans have Real jobs, that produce products, and pay the
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
07-18-2005 | 12:42 AM
#3295
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Republicans have Real jobs, that produce products, and pay the
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
07-18-2005 | 12:42 AM
#3296
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Republicans have Real jobs, that produce products, and pay the
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
07-18-2005 | 12:42 AM
#3297
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Republicans have Real jobs, that produce products, and pay the
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .
07-18-2005 | 12:54 AM
#3298
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
07-18-2005 | 12:54 AM
#3299
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
07-18-2005 | 12:54 AM
#3300
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com