"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi9dabg66hdc@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You don't understand the difference between
> > a mixture and a chemical compound.
>
> yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>
>
> typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.

Ad Hominem... abusive. Red Herring, as well.

Recall your big howler...

> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up all
> the components they are heavier than the individual components.

Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture, and
saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!

I assure you that there are plenty of folk of both
political parties who understand the issue here...
you just happen to be one of the ignorant Righties. : P
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi9dabg66hdc@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You don't understand the difference between
> > a mixture and a chemical compound.
>
> yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>
>
> typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.

Ad Hominem... abusive. Red Herring, as well.

Recall your big howler...

> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up all
> the components they are heavier than the individual components.

Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture, and
saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!

I assure you that there are plenty of folk of both
political parties who understand the issue here...
you just happen to be one of the ignorant Righties. : P
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi9dabg66hdc@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You don't understand the difference between
> > a mixture and a chemical compound.
>
> yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>
>
> typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.

Ad Hominem... abusive. Red Herring, as well.

Recall your big howler...

> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up all
> the components they are heavier than the individual components.

Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture, and
saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!

I assure you that there are plenty of folk of both
political parties who understand the issue here...
you just happen to be one of the ignorant Righties. : P
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi729lumreb8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> > sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

Indeed you are!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi729lumreb8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> > sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

Indeed you are!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi729lumreb8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> > sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

Indeed you are!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfi729lumreb8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> > Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> > sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

Indeed you are!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
> your argument. liar.

Show the lie... or FOAD.

> > Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> > claim cheating when no evidence is shown.
>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.

You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.

> > Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> > couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> > drop
>
> because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.

No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop...
it could have started leaking, or otherwise malfunctioned.
You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
in another condition! I must be right!

> > But you did indeed back away from your
> > complaining about, then using, a brand name.
>
> liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.

Oohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
If you'd had half a brain in your head, you'd have
said "Freon is a brand, Freon 22 is a compound!"...
but that half a brain went wanting.

> > He described Freon as a compound.
>
> wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
> compound".

You gonna do some Clintonesque squirming about
the definition of 'is'? Can you name a Freon that
is not a compound?

> > you said
> > it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
>
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.

Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
> your argument. liar.

Show the lie... or FOAD.

> > Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> > claim cheating when no evidence is shown.
>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.

You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.

> > Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> > couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> > drop
>
> because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.

No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop...
it could have started leaking, or otherwise malfunctioned.
You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
in another condition! I must be right!

> > But you did indeed back away from your
> > complaining about, then using, a brand name.
>
> liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.

Oohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
If you'd had half a brain in your head, you'd have
said "Freon is a brand, Freon 22 is a compound!"...
but that half a brain went wanting.

> > He described Freon as a compound.
>
> wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
> compound".

You gonna do some Clintonesque squirming about
the definition of 'is'? Can you name a Freon that
is not a compound?

> > you said
> > it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
>
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.

Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
> your argument. liar.

Show the lie... or FOAD.

> > Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> > claim cheating when no evidence is shown.
>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.

You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.

> > Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> > couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> > drop
>
> because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.

No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop...
it could have started leaking, or otherwise malfunctioned.
You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
in another condition! I must be right!

> > But you did indeed back away from your
> > complaining about, then using, a brand name.
>
> liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.

Oohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
If you'd had half a brain in your head, you'd have
said "Freon is a brand, Freon 22 is a compound!"...
but that half a brain went wanting.

> > He described Freon as a compound.
>
> wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
> compound".

You gonna do some Clintonesque squirming about
the definition of 'is'? Can you name a Freon that
is not a compound?

> > you said
> > it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
>
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.

Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
__
Steve
..