Point is I have "3.14" memorized, you obviously couldn't remember,
otherwise you wouldn't have written: "3..."
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
> Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
> for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
> Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
> a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
> digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
> number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
> __
> Steve
> .

 

NO WHERE HAVE I STATED "Volume Change = Density" They obviously
different by definition. I said creates, like an explosion by ignition.
Dense!!!!!!!!!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


jeff wrote:
>
> Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
> Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
> statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
> statement?
>
> Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
> happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".

 

NO WHERE HAVE I STATED "Volume Change = Density" They obviously
different by definition. I said creates, like an explosion by ignition.
Dense!!!!!!!!!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


jeff wrote:
>
> Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
> Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
> statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
> statement?
>
> Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
> happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".

 

NO WHERE HAVE I STATED "Volume Change = Density" They obviously
different by definition. I said creates, like an explosion by ignition.
Dense!!!!!!!!!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


jeff wrote:
>
> Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
> Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
> statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
> statement?
>
> Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
> happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".

 

NO WHERE HAVE I STATED "Volume Change = Density" They obviously
different by definition. I said creates, like an explosion by ignition.
Dense!!!!!!!!!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


jeff wrote:
>
> Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
> Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
> statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
> statement?
>
> Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
> happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".

 

Paraphrase: Gobblygook.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> No Nate, you were simply being a pedantic little ***** attempting to
> deflect the core of the discussion with a bit of minutia. You had made
> the statement that CFCs were mixtures. Mixtures and compounds are not
> the same thing. I am aware that Freon is a registered trademark, but it
> has become so generic that to the common man if you were to use the word
> they instantly know what you are talking about. An excellent example of
> this is to search E-Bay (tm) for Freon. Hundreds of hits for Freon-12
> and Freon Sniffers, and Freon conversion kits. As an "Industry Insider"
> you, of course, are daily exposed machinations of DuPont's legal
> department is trying to reassert some level of branding.
> http://www.answers.com/topic/genericized-trademark
> As a final note, when I skin a knuckle working on my jeep, I put a
> bandaid on it.
>
> --
> jeff

 

Paraphrase: Gobblygook.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> No Nate, you were simply being a pedantic little ***** attempting to
> deflect the core of the discussion with a bit of minutia. You had made
> the statement that CFCs were mixtures. Mixtures and compounds are not
> the same thing. I am aware that Freon is a registered trademark, but it
> has become so generic that to the common man if you were to use the word
> they instantly know what you are talking about. An excellent example of
> this is to search E-Bay (tm) for Freon. Hundreds of hits for Freon-12
> and Freon Sniffers, and Freon conversion kits. As an "Industry Insider"
> you, of course, are daily exposed machinations of DuPont's legal
> department is trying to reassert some level of branding.
> http://www.answers.com/topic/genericized-trademark
> As a final note, when I skin a knuckle working on my jeep, I put a
> bandaid on it.
>
> --
> jeff

 

Paraphrase: Gobblygook.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> No Nate, you were simply being a pedantic little ***** attempting to
> deflect the core of the discussion with a bit of minutia. You had made
> the statement that CFCs were mixtures. Mixtures and compounds are not
> the same thing. I am aware that Freon is a registered trademark, but it
> has become so generic that to the common man if you were to use the word
> they instantly know what you are talking about. An excellent example of
> this is to search E-Bay (tm) for Freon. Hundreds of hits for Freon-12
> and Freon Sniffers, and Freon conversion kits. As an "Industry Insider"
> you, of course, are daily exposed machinations of DuPont's legal
> department is trying to reassert some level of branding.
> http://www.answers.com/topic/genericized-trademark
> As a final note, when I skin a knuckle working on my jeep, I put a
> bandaid on it.
>
> --
> jeff

 

Paraphrase: Gobblygook.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> No Nate, you were simply being a pedantic little ***** attempting to
> deflect the core of the discussion with a bit of minutia. You had made
> the statement that CFCs were mixtures. Mixtures and compounds are not
> the same thing. I am aware that Freon is a registered trademark, but it
> has become so generic that to the common man if you were to use the word
> they instantly know what you are talking about. An excellent example of
> this is to search E-Bay (tm) for Freon. Hundreds of hits for Freon-12
> and Freon Sniffers, and Freon conversion kits. As an "Industry Insider"
> you, of course, are daily exposed machinations of DuPont's legal
> department is trying to reassert some level of branding.
> http://www.answers.com/topic/genericized-trademark
> As a final note, when I skin a knuckle working on my jeep, I put a
> bandaid on it.
>
> --
> jeff

 

Here is what you wrote:
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.

Let's parse your statement:
[Just so you now know,] Non-sequitur. Ignore

[created by mixing] Qualifier, we can take that out.
which leaves the meat or your statement:

volume change is their new density.

If you want to divide it up a little finer, the [change] and [their new]
are simply descriptors referring th the new state and can be dropped.

this leaves "volume is density"

Perhaps you would like to rephrase it in a more coherent and cohesive
manner?



L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> NO WHERE HAVE I STATED "Volume Change = Density" They obviously
> different by definition. I said creates, like an explosion by ignition.
> Dense!!!!!!!!!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
>>Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
>>statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
>>statement?
>>
>>Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
>>happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".