"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!

TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> You don't understand the difference between
> a mixture and a chemical compound.

yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>

typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> You don't understand the difference between
> a mixture and a chemical compound.

yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>

typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> You don't understand the difference between
> a mixture and a chemical compound.

yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>

typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:t2JBe.1503$zw4.1074@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> You don't understand the difference between
> a mixture and a chemical compound.

yes oh yes, only you could possibly know that. <rolling eyes>

typical ego of a liberal, nobody knows but you.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
>I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
>popular use.

......what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
your argument. liar.

> Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
-------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.


> Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> drop

because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.


> But you did indeed back away from your
> complaining about, then using, a brand name.

liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.


> He described Freon as a compound.

wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
compound".


> you said
> it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.

mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
defines it as:

"A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."

it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.

liar.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
>I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
>popular use.

......what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
your argument. liar.

> Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
-------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.


> Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> drop

because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.


> But you did indeed back away from your
> complaining about, then using, a brand name.

liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.


> He described Freon as a compound.

wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
compound".


> you said
> it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.

mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
defines it as:

"A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."

it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.

liar.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
>I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
>popular use.

......what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
your argument. liar.

> Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
-------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.


> Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> drop

because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.


> But you did indeed back away from your
> complaining about, then using, a brand name.

liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.


> He described Freon as a compound.

wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
compound".


> you said
> it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.

mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
defines it as:

"A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."

it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.

liar.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
>I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
>popular use.

......what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it fits
your argument. liar.

> Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
> claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
-------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.


> Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
> couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
> drop

because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.


> But you did indeed back away from your
> complaining about, then using, a brand name.

liar. i complained about his definition of a brand name.


> He described Freon as a compound.

wrong liar. he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
compound".


> you said
> it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.

mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
defines it as:

"A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."

it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.

liar.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
<..>
>he _defined_ freon as a compound. to quote: "freon is a
> compound".
>
> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.

No Nate, you were simply being a pedantic little ***** attempting to
deflect the core of the discussion with a bit of minutia. You had made
the statement that CFCs were mixtures. Mixtures and compounds are not
the same thing. I am aware that Freon is a registered trademark, but it
has become so generic that to the common man if you were to use the word
they instantly know what you are talking about. An excellent example of
this is to search E-Bay (tm) for Freon. Hundreds of hits for Freon-12
and Freon Sniffers, and Freon conversion kits. As an "Industry Insider"
you, of course, are daily exposed machinations of DuPont's legal
department is trying to reassert some level of branding.
http://www.answers.com/topic/genericized-trademark
As a final note, when I skin a knuckle working on my jeep, I put a
bandaid on it.

--
jeff