134a Refrigerant
07-15-2005 | 09:56 AM
#3151
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
07-15-2005 | 09:56 AM
#3152
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
07-15-2005 | 09:56 AM
#3153
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
Here you state [Volume Change = Density].
Are you saying I am wrong in calling you on such an obviously incorrect
statement, or are you saying that you think you have made a correct
statement?
Again, you are still attempting, albeit rather poorly, to describe what
happened, and not how and why. Here is a free hint: "Hydrogen Bonding".
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> My God, are you dense!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>>
>>One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
>>volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
>>reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
>>still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
>>state why.
07-15-2005 | 09:58 AM
#3154
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D76135.E917229E@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill's new science... volume = density!
> > That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> > explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> > his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> > they *are* impressive!
> What? Did you forget what twenty two sevenths equals?
Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
__
Steve
..
07-15-2005 | 09:58 AM
#3155
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D76135.E917229E@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill's new science... volume = density!
> > That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> > explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> > his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> > they *are* impressive!
> What? Did you forget what twenty two sevenths equals?
Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
__
Steve
..
07-15-2005 | 09:58 AM
#3156
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D76135.E917229E@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill's new science... volume = density!
> > That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> > explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> > his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> > they *are* impressive!
> What? Did you forget what twenty two sevenths equals?
Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
__
Steve
..
07-15-2005 | 09:58 AM
#3157
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D76135.E917229E@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Bill's new science... volume = density!
> > That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> > explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> > his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> > they *are* impressive!
> What? Did you forget what twenty two sevenths equals?
Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
__
Steve
..
07-15-2005 | 10:32 AM
#3158
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
07-15-2005 | 10:32 AM
#3159
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
07-15-2005 | 10:32 AM
#3160
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:b0JBe.1501$zw4.1177@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com