"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11de45i2n0uhm6a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:8uvBe.1391$zw4.4@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > Freon is not a mixture.
>
> yeah no ----....its what ive told you from the beginning.

You don't understand the difference between
a mixture and a chemical compound.
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D6F57D.D05B08DC@***.net...
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
> >
> > One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> > volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> > reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> > still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> > state why.

> My God, are you dense!

Bill's new science... volume = density!
That's even better than Pi = 3... and
explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
they *are* impressive!
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D6F57D.D05B08DC@***.net...
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
> >
> > One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> > volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> > reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> > still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> > state why.

> My God, are you dense!

Bill's new science... volume = density!
That's even better than Pi = 3... and
explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
they *are* impressive!
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D6F57D.D05B08DC@***.net...
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
> >
> > One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> > volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> > reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> > still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> > state why.

> My God, are you dense!

Bill's new science... volume = density!
That's even better than Pi = 3... and
explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
they *are* impressive!
__
Steve
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42D6F57D.D05B08DC@***.net...
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
> >
> > One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> > volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> > reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> > still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> > state why.

> My God, are you dense!

Bill's new science... volume = density!
That's even better than Pi = 3... and
explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
they *are* impressive!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11de4e5ig9dgp74@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:aKvBe.1395$zw4.39@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?
>
> no.

I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
popular use.

> > don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> > remove refrigerant as well.
>
> lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a
> conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know
> nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know,
> anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry
> where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and
> instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt
> to dazzle us with --------. when that fails you continue to try to spin
> away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack ---- about
> refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)

Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
drop and b) refrigerant is removed in order to compensate
for the lost liquid retention in the condenser.

> > > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.
>
> > Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...
>
> lol horseshit. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you
> would attempt to duplicate me.

But you did indeed back away from your
complaining about, then using, a brand name.
It's in the archives... forever.

> > used a brand name after
> > complaining of same.
>
> LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined
> my statement in any way. liar.

He described Freon as a compound... you said
it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
You seem unaware that Freon can be both a
brand and a compound... actually, you are
grasping at straws, as you have been the whole
time. The archives contain the entire conversation...
it is *indeed* disingenuous of you to call me a liar
when anyone can go verify for themselves.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11de4e5ig9dgp74@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:aKvBe.1395$zw4.39@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?
>
> no.

I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
popular use.

> > don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> > remove refrigerant as well.
>
> lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a
> conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know
> nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know,
> anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry
> where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and
> instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt
> to dazzle us with --------. when that fails you continue to try to spin
> away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack ---- about
> refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)

Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
drop and b) refrigerant is removed in order to compensate
for the lost liquid retention in the condenser.

> > > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.
>
> > Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...
>
> lol horseshit. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you
> would attempt to duplicate me.

But you did indeed back away from your
complaining about, then using, a brand name.
It's in the archives... forever.

> > used a brand name after
> > complaining of same.
>
> LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined
> my statement in any way. liar.

He described Freon as a compound... you said
it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
You seem unaware that Freon can be both a
brand and a compound... actually, you are
grasping at straws, as you have been the whole
time. The archives contain the entire conversation...
it is *indeed* disingenuous of you to call me a liar
when anyone can go verify for themselves.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11de4e5ig9dgp74@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:aKvBe.1395$zw4.39@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?
>
> no.

I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
popular use.

> > don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> > remove refrigerant as well.
>
> lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a
> conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know
> nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know,
> anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry
> where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and
> instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt
> to dazzle us with --------. when that fails you continue to try to spin
> away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack ---- about
> refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)

Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
drop and b) refrigerant is removed in order to compensate
for the lost liquid retention in the condenser.

> > > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.
>
> > Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...
>
> lol horseshit. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you
> would attempt to duplicate me.

But you did indeed back away from your
complaining about, then using, a brand name.
It's in the archives... forever.

> > used a brand name after
> > complaining of same.
>
> LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined
> my statement in any way. liar.

He described Freon as a compound... you said
it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
You seem unaware that Freon can be both a
brand and a compound... actually, you are
grasping at straws, as you have been the whole
time. The archives contain the entire conversation...
it is *indeed* disingenuous of you to call me a liar
when anyone can go verify for themselves.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11de4e5ig9dgp74@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:aKvBe.1395$zw4.39@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?
>
> no.

I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
popular use.

> > don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> > remove refrigerant as well.
>
> lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a
> conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know
> nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know,
> anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry
> where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and
> instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt
> to dazzle us with --------. when that fails you continue to try to spin
> away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack ---- about
> refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)

Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
drop and b) refrigerant is removed in order to compensate
for the lost liquid retention in the condenser.

> > > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.
>
> > Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...
>
> lol horseshit. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you
> would attempt to duplicate me.

But you did indeed back away from your
complaining about, then using, a brand name.
It's in the archives... forever.

> > used a brand name after
> > complaining of same.
>
> LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined
> my statement in any way. liar.

He described Freon as a compound... you said
it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
You seem unaware that Freon can be both a
brand and a compound... actually, you are
grasping at straws, as you have been the whole
time. The archives contain the entire conversation...
it is *indeed* disingenuous of you to call me a liar
when anyone can go verify for themselves.
__
Steve
..

 

How about telling us what you think they are.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> You don't understand the difference between
> a mixture and a chemical compound.
> __
> Steve
> .