Taken out of context as bleeding heart lying liberals often do.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .

 

You keep harping the same thing over and over, like a female, do
people call you girlieman?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
><snip girlieman harping>

 

You keep harping the same thing over and over, like a female, do
people call you girlieman?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
><snip girlieman harping>

 

You keep harping the same thing over and over, like a female, do
people call you girlieman?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
><snip girlieman harping>

 

You keep harping the same thing over and over, like a female, do
people call you girlieman?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
><snip girlieman harping>

 

"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"

One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
state why.



L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
>>condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
>>second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
>>phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
>>Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
>>description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
>>the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>>
>>BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
>>mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
>>reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>>
>>--
>>jeff

 

"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"

One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
state why.



L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
>>condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
>>second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
>>phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
>>Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
>>description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
>>the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>>
>>BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
>>mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
>>reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>>
>>--
>>jeff

 

"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"

One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
state why.



L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
>>condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
>>second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
>>phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
>>Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
>>description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
>>the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>>
>>BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
>>mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
>>reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>>
>>--
>>jeff

 

"The volume change created by mixing is their new density"

One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
state why.



L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> new density.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
>>condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
>>second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
>>phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
>>Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
>>description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
>>the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>>
>>BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
>>mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
>>reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>>
>>--
>>jeff

 

My God, are you dense!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>
> One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> state why.