134a Refrigerant
07-14-2005 | 03:50 PM
#3071
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Did we forget, Freon is made up of Chlorine, Fluorine, and Carbon:
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
07-14-2005 | 03:50 PM
#3072
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Did we forget, Freon is made up of Chlorine, Fluorine, and Carbon:
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
07-14-2005 | 03:50 PM
#3073
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Did we forget, Freon is made up of Chlorine, Fluorine, and Carbon:
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...s.pl?matno=161
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> a mixture.
> __
> Steve
07-14-2005 | 03:59 PM
#3074
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
07-14-2005 | 03:59 PM
#3075
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
07-14-2005 | 03:59 PM
#3076
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
07-14-2005 | 03:59 PM
#3077
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
new density.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> The M-W.com definition you clipped gives two definitions for
> condensation The first is for processes like making condensed soup. The
> second is for what we classicly think of as condensation, that is the
> phase change of matter from one state to another, e.g. steam to water.
> Again, refering back to the original question, this yet another
> description of what has happened. You keep addressing the what, and not
> the why. Care to try your hand and Google up why it happens?
>
> BTW, if you want to quibble a fine point, the mass that results from
> mixing water and alcohol is less than the sum of the masses since the
> reaction is exothermic and everyone knows that E-MC^2 ;-)
>
> --
> jeff
07-14-2005 | 04:01 PM
#3078
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Taken out of context as bleeding heart lying liberals often do.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .
07-14-2005 | 04:01 PM
#3079
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Taken out of context as bleeding heart lying liberals often do.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .
07-14-2005 | 04:01 PM
#3080
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Taken out of context as bleeding heart lying liberals often do.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Post of the Month! Understatement of the Year!
> __
> Steve
> .