Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
per unit volume?

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11d43p89854a1ae@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:aymAe.350$zw4.217@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>> Who said anything about adding stuff? All we were talking
>> about was mixing!
>
> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
> all the components they are heavier than the individual components.
>
>
>>You're the one saying that the gas gets heavier when it's mixed.
>
> EXACTLY! to "mix" something is to combine it with something else. to
> quote dictionary.com :
> 1.. To combine or blend into one mass or mixture.
> 2.. To create or form by combining ingredients: mix a drink; mix cement.
> 3.. To add (an ingredient or element) to another: mix an egg into batter.
> what youre describing is simply shaking something and thats NOT what we're
> discussing. you dont even understand what "mix" means yet youre going to
> attempt to explain ozone depletion? BUWHAHAHA!
>
> sheesh, you really ARE that stupid!
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
>
>

 

Volume change, would that be under pressures or chemicals, like a
catalyst?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

 

Volume change, would that be under pressures or chemicals, like a
catalyst?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

 

Volume change, would that be under pressures or chemicals, like a
catalyst?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

 

Volume change, would that be under pressures or chemicals, like a
catalyst?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:lOadnaNtQYvNbU_fRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

unit volume of each individual element would be the same, certainly. unit
volume is irrelevant however, until the compound is broken down.
refrigerant would be even heavier than the chlorine that stephen fears so.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:lOadnaNtQYvNbU_fRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

unit volume of each individual element would be the same, certainly. unit
volume is irrelevant however, until the compound is broken down.
refrigerant would be even heavier than the chlorine that stephen fears so.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:lOadnaNtQYvNbU_fRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

unit volume of each individual element would be the same, certainly. unit
volume is irrelevant however, until the compound is broken down.
refrigerant would be even heavier than the chlorine that stephen fears so.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:lOadnaNtQYvNbU_fRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier, but would the mixture be heavier
> per unit volume?

unit volume of each individual element would be the same, certainly. unit
volume is irrelevant however, until the compound is broken down.
refrigerant would be even heavier than the chlorine that stephen fears so.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d444hlcaho2c8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:UVmAe.359$zw4.122@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You *still* haven't attacked
> > the substance of my statement.
>
> but i did. i told you that your statement was WRONG.

Pretty lame stuff... got anything better?

> > Discuss where I'm wrong!
>
> lol for one thing you stated it was used in HVAC which its not. WRONG!

I found it in Google under 'HVAC'... is there
a problem? Refrigeration not part of HVAC?

>>> freon is a brand name. HOWEVER, your entire argument is nothing more than a
>>> very loose effort at making a point because i NEVER suggested that an HMC
>>> was anything at all.

>>*Now* we see how little logic has to do with
>>the screws turning up there... read what you
>>just wrote, then get back to us when you can
>>see how stupid it is. Use of the TLA in a
>>sentence implies 'somethingness'... get a clue.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have no valid response" :-)

Why don't you have a response? You claim that
your use of the TLA 'HMC' in a sentence was
meant to imply *nothing at all*... how nice that
you should finally find your verbiage as vapid
as I do.


> > I don't worship anybody
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i worship engineers" :-)

Pitiful... you have my pity.

>
>
> > Actually, Freon *is* a compound
>
> "freon" is a brand name. refrigerant is a compound. but i wouldnt expect a
> tar-baby to understand that.

Oh, now with the 'tar-baby' epithet... well, it turns
out that it just might be the most apropos epithet
you've ever used. Go back and read about Brer'
Rabbit... then come back and punch the Tar Baby
some more.

So Freon(tm) is not a compound, but HeadMaster(tm)
is not a brand? How your head spins!

> > Complaining
> > about use of a brand name, then using a brand name...
> > double standard, logical-disconnect thinking
>
> what horse crap! i never said that an HMC was an object or anything else.
> i simply listed its common reference within the industry. i wouldnt expect
> you to know that because i knew you were full of ---- from the start. :-)

Once I found out that it was supposed to read 'Head Master Control'
(which is wrong, see above) I made educated guesses without using
Google... evidently I got pretty close, since you have steered very
clear of rebutting them.

Tell us again how the whole world is wrong!
__
Steve
..