"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qhrh4m5lefd@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:F6dAe.42$zw4.41@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
> > Buy a new can of paint... weigh it.
>
> > Put it in the paint shaker machine...
> > run the machine, then weigh it.
>
> > Then get back to us.
>
> i guess i overestimated you. you really _are_ that stupid (no wonder you
> fall for the liberal seminar -------- so easily!). my condolences to your
> friends and family. to put it into terms you can understand, put a gallon
> of paint into a paint shaker. shake it, and weigh it. now put 3 oz. of
> thinner into the gallon. shake it (thus mixing it) and youll find that
> gallon of paint now weighs 3 oz. more than it did before. THAT is how
> combining elements make them heavier.

Who said anything about adding stuff? All we were talking
about was mixing! All the parts are already there. You're
the one saying that the gas gets heavier when it's mixed.

Save your condolences for your own family, BTW... and
point out to me where I can find this 'liberal seminar'...
I've never heard of one.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qhrh4m5lefd@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:F6dAe.42$zw4.41@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
> > Buy a new can of paint... weigh it.
>
> > Put it in the paint shaker machine...
> > run the machine, then weigh it.
>
> > Then get back to us.
>
> i guess i overestimated you. you really _are_ that stupid (no wonder you
> fall for the liberal seminar -------- so easily!). my condolences to your
> friends and family. to put it into terms you can understand, put a gallon
> of paint into a paint shaker. shake it, and weigh it. now put 3 oz. of
> thinner into the gallon. shake it (thus mixing it) and youll find that
> gallon of paint now weighs 3 oz. more than it did before. THAT is how
> combining elements make them heavier.

Who said anything about adding stuff? All we were talking
about was mixing! All the parts are already there. You're
the one saying that the gas gets heavier when it's mixed.

Save your condolences for your own family, BTW... and
point out to me where I can find this 'liberal seminar'...
I've never heard of one.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qhrh4m5lefd@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:F6dAe.42$zw4.41@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
> > Buy a new can of paint... weigh it.
>
> > Put it in the paint shaker machine...
> > run the machine, then weigh it.
>
> > Then get back to us.
>
> i guess i overestimated you. you really _are_ that stupid (no wonder you
> fall for the liberal seminar -------- so easily!). my condolences to your
> friends and family. to put it into terms you can understand, put a gallon
> of paint into a paint shaker. shake it, and weigh it. now put 3 oz. of
> thinner into the gallon. shake it (thus mixing it) and youll find that
> gallon of paint now weighs 3 oz. more than it did before. THAT is how
> combining elements make them heavier.

Who said anything about adding stuff? All we were talking
about was mixing! All the parts are already there. You're
the one saying that the gas gets heavier when it's mixed.

Save your condolences for your own family, BTW... and
point out to me where I can find this 'liberal seminar'...
I've never heard of one.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qbo5aa88gae@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:B1dAe.41$zw4.38@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no proof"
>

I need no proof... you've got Bill!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qbo5aa88gae@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:B1dAe.41$zw4.38@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no proof"
>

I need no proof... you've got Bill!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qbo5aa88gae@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:B1dAe.41$zw4.38@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no proof"
>

I need no proof... you've got Bill!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qbo5aa88gae@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:B1dAe.41$zw4.38@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no proof"
>

I need no proof... you've got Bill!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qrulauhqi26@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:CpdAe.45$zw4.0@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>Then why did you give me what it stood for?
>>You should have jumped me then, if you were
>>just trying to prove that your tradecraft arcana
>>was the important thing you learned in school.
>>You chose to play along... so that excuse is
>>no longer available for you.
>
> because anyone with any real experience in my industry (which you pretend to
> have) would have known exactly what i referenced. i uncovered your
> --------, and its been a pleasure.

As I said, you're too late. You didn't jump me
when the claim about the TLA was valid. You
might stop pleasuring yourself and address the
arguments.

> > You still haven't attacked the substance of
> > my guesses about the use of the Head
> > Pressure Control... *before* I googled it.
>
> but i did! i told you that youd better go get better information because
> you were completely wrong from the start. thats what you get from asking
> your cousins husbands brother who just started hvac tech school.

No... you don't get it. You *still* haven't attacked
the substance of my statement. All we get are
empty assertions. Discuss where I'm wrong!
You can use my second (post-Google) post to
refer to... it might help you somewhat.

> > My point is.... I can learn about your
> > industry fairly quickly... I've already
> > got the controls background to tackle
> > it, and the rest is physics,
>
> lol yeah youre the real expert!

Back it up, or suck it up.

> > Do you assert that Freon is not a compound?
>
> freon is a brand name. HOWEVER, your entire argument is nothing more than a
> very loose effort at making a point because i NEVER suggested that an HMC
> was anything at all.

*Now* we see how little logic has to do with
the screws turning up there... read what you
just wrote, then get back to us when you can
see how stupid it is. Use of the TLA in a
sentence implies 'somethingness'... get a clue.

> the engineer you worship said "freon is a compound"
> and i nailed him on it.

I don't worship anybody... more crap from you.
Actually, Freon *is* a compound, and you are
pretty stupid to take the counter argument.

> i never made any such statements about an HMC so
> your argument stands totally without merit (like most everything else youve
> had to say).

Empty blather... as long as you're talking, you're
happy... it doesn't have to make sense, obviously.
*You* got nailed... hoist on your own petard. Complaining
about use of a brand name, then using a brand name...
double standard, logical-disconnect thinking... or
jaw-flapping, more like.

Keep doing it... I know you don't want to stop.
I *do* get some perverse pleasure out of dragging
these bits of illogic out into the open. Just think how
long these fallacies of yours will live in the archives!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qrulauhqi26@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:CpdAe.45$zw4.0@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>Then why did you give me what it stood for?
>>You should have jumped me then, if you were
>>just trying to prove that your tradecraft arcana
>>was the important thing you learned in school.
>>You chose to play along... so that excuse is
>>no longer available for you.
>
> because anyone with any real experience in my industry (which you pretend to
> have) would have known exactly what i referenced. i uncovered your
> --------, and its been a pleasure.

As I said, you're too late. You didn't jump me
when the claim about the TLA was valid. You
might stop pleasuring yourself and address the
arguments.

> > You still haven't attacked the substance of
> > my guesses about the use of the Head
> > Pressure Control... *before* I googled it.
>
> but i did! i told you that youd better go get better information because
> you were completely wrong from the start. thats what you get from asking
> your cousins husbands brother who just started hvac tech school.

No... you don't get it. You *still* haven't attacked
the substance of my statement. All we get are
empty assertions. Discuss where I'm wrong!
You can use my second (post-Google) post to
refer to... it might help you somewhat.

> > My point is.... I can learn about your
> > industry fairly quickly... I've already
> > got the controls background to tackle
> > it, and the rest is physics,
>
> lol yeah youre the real expert!

Back it up, or suck it up.

> > Do you assert that Freon is not a compound?
>
> freon is a brand name. HOWEVER, your entire argument is nothing more than a
> very loose effort at making a point because i NEVER suggested that an HMC
> was anything at all.

*Now* we see how little logic has to do with
the screws turning up there... read what you
just wrote, then get back to us when you can
see how stupid it is. Use of the TLA in a
sentence implies 'somethingness'... get a clue.

> the engineer you worship said "freon is a compound"
> and i nailed him on it.

I don't worship anybody... more crap from you.
Actually, Freon *is* a compound, and you are
pretty stupid to take the counter argument.

> i never made any such statements about an HMC so
> your argument stands totally without merit (like most everything else youve
> had to say).

Empty blather... as long as you're talking, you're
happy... it doesn't have to make sense, obviously.
*You* got nailed... hoist on your own petard. Complaining
about use of a brand name, then using a brand name...
double standard, logical-disconnect thinking... or
jaw-flapping, more like.

Keep doing it... I know you don't want to stop.
I *do* get some perverse pleasure out of dragging
these bits of illogic out into the open. Just think how
long these fallacies of yours will live in the archives!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11d2qrulauhqi26@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:CpdAe.45$zw4.0@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>Then why did you give me what it stood for?
>>You should have jumped me then, if you were
>>just trying to prove that your tradecraft arcana
>>was the important thing you learned in school.
>>You chose to play along... so that excuse is
>>no longer available for you.
>
> because anyone with any real experience in my industry (which you pretend to
> have) would have known exactly what i referenced. i uncovered your
> --------, and its been a pleasure.

As I said, you're too late. You didn't jump me
when the claim about the TLA was valid. You
might stop pleasuring yourself and address the
arguments.

> > You still haven't attacked the substance of
> > my guesses about the use of the Head
> > Pressure Control... *before* I googled it.
>
> but i did! i told you that youd better go get better information because
> you were completely wrong from the start. thats what you get from asking
> your cousins husbands brother who just started hvac tech school.

No... you don't get it. You *still* haven't attacked
the substance of my statement. All we get are
empty assertions. Discuss where I'm wrong!
You can use my second (post-Google) post to
refer to... it might help you somewhat.

> > My point is.... I can learn about your
> > industry fairly quickly... I've already
> > got the controls background to tackle
> > it, and the rest is physics,
>
> lol yeah youre the real expert!

Back it up, or suck it up.

> > Do you assert that Freon is not a compound?
>
> freon is a brand name. HOWEVER, your entire argument is nothing more than a
> very loose effort at making a point because i NEVER suggested that an HMC
> was anything at all.

*Now* we see how little logic has to do with
the screws turning up there... read what you
just wrote, then get back to us when you can
see how stupid it is. Use of the TLA in a
sentence implies 'somethingness'... get a clue.

> the engineer you worship said "freon is a compound"
> and i nailed him on it.

I don't worship anybody... more crap from you.
Actually, Freon *is* a compound, and you are
pretty stupid to take the counter argument.

> i never made any such statements about an HMC so
> your argument stands totally without merit (like most everything else youve
> had to say).

Empty blather... as long as you're talking, you're
happy... it doesn't have to make sense, obviously.
*You* got nailed... hoist on your own petard. Complaining
about use of a brand name, then using a brand name...
double standard, logical-disconnect thinking... or
jaw-flapping, more like.

Keep doing it... I know you don't want to stop.
I *do* get some perverse pleasure out of dragging
these bits of illogic out into the open. Just think how
long these fallacies of yours will live in the archives!
__
Steve
..