"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..

> is a component of
> the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> 'object'?

i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
with the red herrings already and stay on topic. bottom line, a heavier
object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..

> is a component of
> the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> 'object'?

i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
with the red herrings already and stay on topic. bottom line, a heavier
object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..

> is a component of
> the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> 'object'?

i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
with the red herrings already and stay on topic. bottom line, a heavier
object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjcv96bul8ad@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:zhGye.870$Ku6.235@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> you havent been paying attention.

>>smirk... smirk.... you lose!

> TRANSLATION --> "if you tell a lie often enough people will believe it"

*That's* what they teach at the NeoCon seminars...
witness the confusion between 9/11 and Saddam.

>>> > I've also proven that argon is heavier than air,
>>> > and is found in the upper atmosphere in the ozone layer.
>>>
>>> youve not shown the source. perhaps its falling. you simply dont know but
>>> are grasping at whatever you can find.

>>Ah yes, the interstellar Argon that everyone's
>>talking about... makes it kinda cloudy for
>>telescopes, they can only see for billions
>>of light-years.

>>The only thing that's falling is the sky...
>>don't look up!

> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot prove its origin"

Why should I bother? You wouldn't know a proper
proof if it bit you on the ***! You still assert that
Freon doesn't become part of the earth's atmosphere!
Where does it go? Why do the scientists lie and say
they measure it? Why don't other scientists point out
the lie? All a giant conspiracy?
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjcv96bul8ad@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:zhGye.870$Ku6.235@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> you havent been paying attention.

>>smirk... smirk.... you lose!

> TRANSLATION --> "if you tell a lie often enough people will believe it"

*That's* what they teach at the NeoCon seminars...
witness the confusion between 9/11 and Saddam.

>>> > I've also proven that argon is heavier than air,
>>> > and is found in the upper atmosphere in the ozone layer.
>>>
>>> youve not shown the source. perhaps its falling. you simply dont know but
>>> are grasping at whatever you can find.

>>Ah yes, the interstellar Argon that everyone's
>>talking about... makes it kinda cloudy for
>>telescopes, they can only see for billions
>>of light-years.

>>The only thing that's falling is the sky...
>>don't look up!

> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot prove its origin"

Why should I bother? You wouldn't know a proper
proof if it bit you on the ***! You still assert that
Freon doesn't become part of the earth's atmosphere!
Where does it go? Why do the scientists lie and say
they measure it? Why don't other scientists point out
the lie? All a giant conspiracy?
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjcv96bul8ad@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:zhGye.870$Ku6.235@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> you havent been paying attention.

>>smirk... smirk.... you lose!

> TRANSLATION --> "if you tell a lie often enough people will believe it"

*That's* what they teach at the NeoCon seminars...
witness the confusion between 9/11 and Saddam.

>>> > I've also proven that argon is heavier than air,
>>> > and is found in the upper atmosphere in the ozone layer.
>>>
>>> youve not shown the source. perhaps its falling. you simply dont know but
>>> are grasping at whatever you can find.

>>Ah yes, the interstellar Argon that everyone's
>>talking about... makes it kinda cloudy for
>>telescopes, they can only see for billions
>>of light-years.

>>The only thing that's falling is the sky...
>>don't look up!

> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot prove its origin"

Why should I bother? You wouldn't know a proper
proof if it bit you on the ***! You still assert that
Freon doesn't become part of the earth's atmosphere!
Where does it go? Why do the scientists lie and say
they measure it? Why don't other scientists point out
the lie? All a giant conspiracy?
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjcv96bul8ad@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:zhGye.870$Ku6.235@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> you havent been paying attention.

>>smirk... smirk.... you lose!

> TRANSLATION --> "if you tell a lie often enough people will believe it"

*That's* what they teach at the NeoCon seminars...
witness the confusion between 9/11 and Saddam.

>>> > I've also proven that argon is heavier than air,
>>> > and is found in the upper atmosphere in the ozone layer.
>>>
>>> youve not shown the source. perhaps its falling. you simply dont know but
>>> are grasping at whatever you can find.

>>Ah yes, the interstellar Argon that everyone's
>>talking about... makes it kinda cloudy for
>>telescopes, they can only see for billions
>>of light-years.

>>The only thing that's falling is the sky...
>>don't look up!

> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot prove its origin"

Why should I bother? You wouldn't know a proper
proof if it bit you on the ***! You still assert that
Freon doesn't become part of the earth's atmosphere!
Where does it go? Why do the scientists lie and say
they measure it? Why don't other scientists point out
the lie? All a giant conspiracy?
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmje1ohdjhice@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:RiGye.871$Ku6.794@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>> > address the science, not the source.
>
>>> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide a credible source"

>>We've seen the lack of credible sources on your
>>part already... enough about that.

>>Talk about how the whole world is wrong,
>>and you're right... and another thing against
>>you, Bill's on your side!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "please stop asking me for proof"

Bill's on your side! E = mc^2! 'Nuff said!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmje1ohdjhice@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:RiGye.871$Ku6.794@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>> > address the science, not the source.
>
>>> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide a credible source"

>>We've seen the lack of credible sources on your
>>part already... enough about that.

>>Talk about how the whole world is wrong,
>>and you're right... and another thing against
>>you, Bill's on your side!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "please stop asking me for proof"

Bill's on your side! E = mc^2! 'Nuff said!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmje1ohdjhice@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:RiGye.871$Ku6.794@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>> > address the science, not the source.
>
>>> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide a credible source"

>>We've seen the lack of credible sources on your
>>part already... enough about that.

>>Talk about how the whole world is wrong,
>>and you're right... and another thing against
>>you, Bill's on your side!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "please stop asking me for proof"

Bill's on your side! E = mc^2! 'Nuff said!
__
Steve
..