"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kDGye.878$Ku6.754@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>> Head Master Control

> Scout's Honor, no google

better try google.

my point in even mentioning it to an "engineer" was to prove that
engineers/scientists arent omnipotent. sometimes theres no replacing an
experienced field tech.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
..

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:tpHye.1258$Ae.74@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.. .
> (*nobody* calls
> it a HMC)

lol....YOU are going to tell ME about the terminology in my own industry?

BUWAHAHA!


> I'd suppose that in a pinch, without low ambient
> temps coming, you could just do without the
> HPC (proper terminology).

whomever youre asking obviously doesnt know ---- about refrigeration.
perhaps your cousins husband is fresh out of hvac school but you dont need
an hvac guy to answer this question for you....youd better ask a
refrigeration tech if you could "just do without the HMC".


> Here's a poser

lol no thanks, not interested. ill leave the grunge work to tar babies like
you. :-) im not in your industry, nor do i pretend to know (or even care
to know for that matter) 2 things about it.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:tpHye.1258$Ae.74@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.. .
> (*nobody* calls
> it a HMC)

lol....YOU are going to tell ME about the terminology in my own industry?

BUWAHAHA!


> I'd suppose that in a pinch, without low ambient
> temps coming, you could just do without the
> HPC (proper terminology).

whomever youre asking obviously doesnt know ---- about refrigeration.
perhaps your cousins husband is fresh out of hvac school but you dont need
an hvac guy to answer this question for you....youd better ask a
refrigeration tech if you could "just do without the HMC".


> Here's a poser

lol no thanks, not interested. ill leave the grunge work to tar babies like
you. :-) im not in your industry, nor do i pretend to know (or even care
to know for that matter) 2 things about it.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:tpHye.1258$Ae.74@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.. .
> (*nobody* calls
> it a HMC)

lol....YOU are going to tell ME about the terminology in my own industry?

BUWAHAHA!


> I'd suppose that in a pinch, without low ambient
> temps coming, you could just do without the
> HPC (proper terminology).

whomever youre asking obviously doesnt know ---- about refrigeration.
perhaps your cousins husband is fresh out of hvac school but you dont need
an hvac guy to answer this question for you....youd better ask a
refrigeration tech if you could "just do without the HMC".


> Here's a poser

lol no thanks, not interested. ill leave the grunge work to tar babies like
you. :-) im not in your industry, nor do i pretend to know (or even care
to know for that matter) 2 things about it.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:tpHye.1258$Ae.74@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.. .
> (*nobody* calls
> it a HMC)

lol....YOU are going to tell ME about the terminology in my own industry?

BUWAHAHA!


> I'd suppose that in a pinch, without low ambient
> temps coming, you could just do without the
> HPC (proper terminology).

whomever youre asking obviously doesnt know ---- about refrigeration.
perhaps your cousins husband is fresh out of hvac school but you dont need
an hvac guy to answer this question for you....youd better ask a
refrigeration tech if you could "just do without the HMC".


> Here's a poser

lol no thanks, not interested. ill leave the grunge work to tar babies like
you. :-) im not in your industry, nor do i pretend to know (or even care
to know for that matter) 2 things about it.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjav8o2jcn6e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:OeGye.869$Ku6.862@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> which is what ive told you from the beginning. your links are crap. weight
>>> has nothing to do with altitude. a heavier object will rest below a lighter
>>>object at any altitude.

>>Gas is an 'object'? New one on me...

> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, so ill throw a red herring"

Just answer the question... is a component of
the atmosphere properly referred to as an
'object'? It really points to the heart of the
matter... the atmosphere is a mixture
of gases, amorphous up to about 100km.

Obviously, you haven't done the gasoline
fume experiment yet!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjav8o2jcn6e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:OeGye.869$Ku6.862@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> which is what ive told you from the beginning. your links are crap. weight
>>> has nothing to do with altitude. a heavier object will rest below a lighter
>>>object at any altitude.

>>Gas is an 'object'? New one on me...

> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, so ill throw a red herring"

Just answer the question... is a component of
the atmosphere properly referred to as an
'object'? It really points to the heart of the
matter... the atmosphere is a mixture
of gases, amorphous up to about 100km.

Obviously, you haven't done the gasoline
fume experiment yet!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjav8o2jcn6e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:OeGye.869$Ku6.862@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> which is what ive told you from the beginning. your links are crap. weight
>>> has nothing to do with altitude. a heavier object will rest below a lighter
>>>object at any altitude.

>>Gas is an 'object'? New one on me...

> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, so ill throw a red herring"

Just answer the question... is a component of
the atmosphere properly referred to as an
'object'? It really points to the heart of the
matter... the atmosphere is a mixture
of gases, amorphous up to about 100km.

Obviously, you haven't done the gasoline
fume experiment yet!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11cmjav8o2jcn6e@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:OeGye.869$Ku6.862@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
>>> which is what ive told you from the beginning. your links are crap. weight
>>> has nothing to do with altitude. a heavier object will rest below a lighter
>>>object at any altitude.

>>Gas is an 'object'? New one on me...

> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, so ill throw a red herring"

Just answer the question... is a component of
the atmosphere properly referred to as an
'object'? It really points to the heart of the
matter... the atmosphere is a mixture
of gases, amorphous up to about 100km.

Obviously, you haven't done the gasoline
fume experiment yet!
__
Steve
..

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4bJye.1269$Ae.943@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com. ..

> is a component of
> the atmosphere properly referred to as an
> 'object'?

i was referencing the atomic weight of the gas and you know it, now stop
with the red herrings already and stay on topic. bottom line, a heavier
object (or liquid, or gas) will settle below a lighter one at _any_ altitude
and not just above a magical number as you stated earlier.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com