"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:58oxe.1857$U61.477@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1120227163.eac729a37259fc08a31569ad20e47af8@t eranews...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:ic5xe.1449$U61.613@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > > ...
> > > Sorry, Earle... I choose to live in Austin, because I like it here.
> >
> > Thus explaining a lot.
>
> Hey, look where you live!

I live in Jeep Heaven, and you don't.

http://ebussilvertonws.ebusbuilder.c...documentid=395

Earle

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:58oxe.1857$U61.477@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1120227163.eac729a37259fc08a31569ad20e47af8@t eranews...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:ic5xe.1449$U61.613@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > > ...
> > > Sorry, Earle... I choose to live in Austin, because I like it here.
> >
> > Thus explaining a lot.
>
> Hey, look where you live!

I live in Jeep Heaven, and you don't.

http://ebussilvertonws.ebusbuilder.c...documentid=395

Earle

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:58oxe.1857$U61.477@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...

> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1120227163.eac729a37259fc08a31569ad20e47af8@t eranews...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:ic5xe.1449$U61.613@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> > > ...
> > > Sorry, Earle... I choose to live in Austin, because I like it here.
> >
> > Thus explaining a lot.
>
> Hey, look where you live!

I live in Jeep Heaven, and you don't.

http://ebussilvertonws.ebusbuilder.c...documentid=395

Earle

 

"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:bcd3c$42c67eec$4275e0e2$18390@FUSE.NET...
>
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message
> news:3Cdxe.5995$Dv3.2937@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > <snip large quantities of -------->
> >
> > You know, it's so funny that in this group, if someone wrongly posts a
for
> > sale item or whatever, they get blasted by half a dozen people, or
> > reported
> > for abuse to their ISP, for violating the charter of this NG, and yet
this
> > f$%king thread has gone on for weeks, and for hundreds of posts. Why
don't
> > you two take this garbage elsewhere. It looks like the people that do
the
> > "abuse reporting" are quite selective in who they report. This whole
> > thread
> > is very childish.
>
> Have you read the charter? It's only a charter calling for the creation of
> the newsgroup. It outlines what topics were planned to be discussed in
this
> newsgroup. It's not some moderation ruleset like they'll have you believe.
> This newsgroup is unmoderated, and you're free to talk about anything, but
> try and adhere to netiquette, and please mark off-topic discussions as
such
> in the subject.
>

Which is EXACTLY what I did. The people engaging in this nonsense didn't
bother to do that for the first 500 posts. Maybe since Nathan has his own
website with a forum there, he could carry on with this drivel there. I
think that would be a good example of netiquette. Like I said in my last
post, if just about anyone else had gone on like this with an off topic
thread, our resident netkop would have surely reported them to their ISP by
now. I think the majority that read this newsgroup have had more than enough
of it. Yeah we can filter the thread, or the people engaging in it, but it
doesn't belong here and we really shouldn't have to, should we?

Chris

 

"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:bcd3c$42c67eec$4275e0e2$18390@FUSE.NET...
>
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message
> news:3Cdxe.5995$Dv3.2937@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > <snip large quantities of -------->
> >
> > You know, it's so funny that in this group, if someone wrongly posts a
for
> > sale item or whatever, they get blasted by half a dozen people, or
> > reported
> > for abuse to their ISP, for violating the charter of this NG, and yet
this
> > f$%king thread has gone on for weeks, and for hundreds of posts. Why
don't
> > you two take this garbage elsewhere. It looks like the people that do
the
> > "abuse reporting" are quite selective in who they report. This whole
> > thread
> > is very childish.
>
> Have you read the charter? It's only a charter calling for the creation of
> the newsgroup. It outlines what topics were planned to be discussed in
this
> newsgroup. It's not some moderation ruleset like they'll have you believe.
> This newsgroup is unmoderated, and you're free to talk about anything, but
> try and adhere to netiquette, and please mark off-topic discussions as
such
> in the subject.
>

Which is EXACTLY what I did. The people engaging in this nonsense didn't
bother to do that for the first 500 posts. Maybe since Nathan has his own
website with a forum there, he could carry on with this drivel there. I
think that would be a good example of netiquette. Like I said in my last
post, if just about anyone else had gone on like this with an off topic
thread, our resident netkop would have surely reported them to their ISP by
now. I think the majority that read this newsgroup have had more than enough
of it. Yeah we can filter the thread, or the people engaging in it, but it
doesn't belong here and we really shouldn't have to, should we?

Chris

 

"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:bcd3c$42c67eec$4275e0e2$18390@FUSE.NET...
>
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message
> news:3Cdxe.5995$Dv3.2937@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > <snip large quantities of -------->
> >
> > You know, it's so funny that in this group, if someone wrongly posts a
for
> > sale item or whatever, they get blasted by half a dozen people, or
> > reported
> > for abuse to their ISP, for violating the charter of this NG, and yet
this
> > f$%king thread has gone on for weeks, and for hundreds of posts. Why
don't
> > you two take this garbage elsewhere. It looks like the people that do
the
> > "abuse reporting" are quite selective in who they report. This whole
> > thread
> > is very childish.
>
> Have you read the charter? It's only a charter calling for the creation of
> the newsgroup. It outlines what topics were planned to be discussed in
this
> newsgroup. It's not some moderation ruleset like they'll have you believe.
> This newsgroup is unmoderated, and you're free to talk about anything, but
> try and adhere to netiquette, and please mark off-topic discussions as
such
> in the subject.
>

Which is EXACTLY what I did. The people engaging in this nonsense didn't
bother to do that for the first 500 posts. Maybe since Nathan has his own
website with a forum there, he could carry on with this drivel there. I
think that would be a good example of netiquette. Like I said in my last
post, if just about anyone else had gone on like this with an off topic
thread, our resident netkop would have surely reported them to their ISP by
now. I think the majority that read this newsgroup have had more than enough
of it. Yeah we can filter the thread, or the people engaging in it, but it
doesn't belong here and we really shouldn't have to, should we?

Chris

 

"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:bcd3c$42c67eec$4275e0e2$18390@FUSE.NET...
>
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message
> news:3Cdxe.5995$Dv3.2937@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > <snip large quantities of -------->
> >
> > You know, it's so funny that in this group, if someone wrongly posts a
for
> > sale item or whatever, they get blasted by half a dozen people, or
> > reported
> > for abuse to their ISP, for violating the charter of this NG, and yet
this
> > f$%king thread has gone on for weeks, and for hundreds of posts. Why
don't
> > you two take this garbage elsewhere. It looks like the people that do
the
> > "abuse reporting" are quite selective in who they report. This whole
> > thread
> > is very childish.
>
> Have you read the charter? It's only a charter calling for the creation of
> the newsgroup. It outlines what topics were planned to be discussed in
this
> newsgroup. It's not some moderation ruleset like they'll have you believe.
> This newsgroup is unmoderated, and you're free to talk about anything, but
> try and adhere to netiquette, and please mark off-topic discussions as
such
> in the subject.
>

Which is EXACTLY what I did. The people engaging in this nonsense didn't
bother to do that for the first 500 posts. Maybe since Nathan has his own
website with a forum there, he could carry on with this drivel there. I
think that would be a good example of netiquette. Like I said in my last
post, if just about anyone else had gone on like this with an off topic
thread, our resident netkop would have surely reported them to their ISP by
now. I think the majority that read this newsgroup have had more than enough
of it. Yeah we can filter the thread, or the people engaging in it, but it
doesn't belong here and we really shouldn't have to, should we?

Chris

 

"He's less of a nobody than you" Yes. But I have a Real domain,
"factcheck.com" is NOT!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He's less of a nobody than you, I didn't hear Cheney mention
> www.----------.com during the debate. Not even registered? You did what
> Cheney did and used "factcheck.com" on your whois lookup.

 

"He's less of a nobody than you" Yes. But I have a Real domain,
"factcheck.com" is NOT!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He's less of a nobody than you, I didn't hear Cheney mention
> www.----------.com during the debate. Not even registered? You did what
> Cheney did and used "factcheck.com" on your whois lookup.

 

"He's less of a nobody than you" Yes. But I have a Real domain,
"factcheck.com" is NOT!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He's less of a nobody than you, I didn't hear Cheney mention
> www.----------.com during the debate. Not even registered? You did what
> Cheney did and used "factcheck.com" on your whois lookup.