Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <40784005.CCC01305@opelc.com>, sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I think that all couples should be screened before they are
> allowed to have children.....

<snip>

Good idea, _if_ we could trust the government.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B9F1B5D2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> news:timberwoof-CAFA0F.23031609042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
>
> > In article <Xns94C67AEF6B7C1xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> news:timberwoof-421989.20170308042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <c53e8j$2os43j$1@ID-170553.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> >> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:timberwoof-776870.20035007042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <c525mq$cah$1@news.wplus.net>, Xomicron
> >> >> > <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.teranew s.com:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> >> >> >> Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial
> >> >> >> >> activism
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> --- Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> >> >> >> 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on
> >> >> >> >> same---- adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does
> >> >> >> >> not establish a right for homosexuals to parent displaced
> >> >> >> >> children.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> >> >> >> interests of its displaced children to be adopted by
> >> >> >> >> individuals who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the
> >> >> >> >> Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Probably. With their source of new recuits gone, how will they
> >> >> >> swell their ranks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Either you've got ---- for brains or you're liars. You're
> >> >> > certainly spammers. Did you really think you could repeat those
> >> >> > same, tired old discredited babblings about "recruitment" and not
> >> >> > have someone point out your idiocy? Oh, sorry, that was rude.
> >> >> > Well, if you're not ignorant on the subject than you're being
> >> >> > malicious.
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess that explains why a common rallying cry at gay pride parades
> >> >> is "10% is not enough, recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >> >
> >> > Ah, I see. You are a liar. In my years of attending and being in
> >> > pride parades, I've never heard that "rallying cry"
> >>
> >> Typical lying ------.
> >
> > Typical -----for-brains religious lunatic.*
> >
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~generalgayety/pride.html
> >> http://www.xtra.ca/site/toronto2/arch/body630.shtm
> >> http://blog.feelourpain.com/archives/2004_04.html
> >>
> >> Writing in The Advocate, lesbian activist Donna Minkowitz urged her
> >> comrades to "take the offensive for a change, whether the issue is
> >> promiscuity or recruiting the previously straight.... Ten percent is
> >> not enough! Recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >>
> >> This comes from the same people who will claim in the next breath that
> >> homosexuality is a product of "nature" not "nuture."
> >
> > Typical ignorant or malicious homophobe, assuming that all gay people
> > are members of some giant Borg Collective, all thinking the same things.
>
> Moving the goalposts? First you claim that no homosexuals ever shout that
> slogan

Again, you're either stupid or malicious. If you read what I said and
didn't understand it, you're stupid. If you read and understood what I
said, then you're malicious.

> and now you claim that not all of them think that way.
>
> Stay stupid, filthy ------. It's not like you can help it.

I'm leaning to the conclusion that you're not merely ignorant but a
typical malicious and potentially violent homophobe.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B9F1B5D2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> news:timberwoof-CAFA0F.23031609042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
>
> > In article <Xns94C67AEF6B7C1xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> news:timberwoof-421989.20170308042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <c53e8j$2os43j$1@ID-170553.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> >> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:timberwoof-776870.20035007042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <c525mq$cah$1@news.wplus.net>, Xomicron
> >> >> > <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.teranew s.com:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> >> >> >> Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial
> >> >> >> >> activism
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> --- Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> >> >> >> 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on
> >> >> >> >> same---- adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does
> >> >> >> >> not establish a right for homosexuals to parent displaced
> >> >> >> >> children.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> >> >> >> interests of its displaced children to be adopted by
> >> >> >> >> individuals who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the
> >> >> >> >> Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Probably. With their source of new recuits gone, how will they
> >> >> >> swell their ranks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Either you've got ---- for brains or you're liars. You're
> >> >> > certainly spammers. Did you really think you could repeat those
> >> >> > same, tired old discredited babblings about "recruitment" and not
> >> >> > have someone point out your idiocy? Oh, sorry, that was rude.
> >> >> > Well, if you're not ignorant on the subject than you're being
> >> >> > malicious.
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess that explains why a common rallying cry at gay pride parades
> >> >> is "10% is not enough, recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >> >
> >> > Ah, I see. You are a liar. In my years of attending and being in
> >> > pride parades, I've never heard that "rallying cry"
> >>
> >> Typical lying ------.
> >
> > Typical -----for-brains religious lunatic.*
> >
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~generalgayety/pride.html
> >> http://www.xtra.ca/site/toronto2/arch/body630.shtm
> >> http://blog.feelourpain.com/archives/2004_04.html
> >>
> >> Writing in The Advocate, lesbian activist Donna Minkowitz urged her
> >> comrades to "take the offensive for a change, whether the issue is
> >> promiscuity or recruiting the previously straight.... Ten percent is
> >> not enough! Recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >>
> >> This comes from the same people who will claim in the next breath that
> >> homosexuality is a product of "nature" not "nuture."
> >
> > Typical ignorant or malicious homophobe, assuming that all gay people
> > are members of some giant Borg Collective, all thinking the same things.
>
> Moving the goalposts? First you claim that no homosexuals ever shout that
> slogan

Again, you're either stupid or malicious. If you read what I said and
didn't understand it, you're stupid. If you read and understood what I
said, then you're malicious.

> and now you claim that not all of them think that way.
>
> Stay stupid, filthy ------. It's not like you can help it.

I'm leaning to the conclusion that you're not merely ignorant but a
typical malicious and potentially violent homophobe.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B9F1B5D2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> news:timberwoof-CAFA0F.23031609042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
>
> > In article <Xns94C67AEF6B7C1xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> news:timberwoof-421989.20170308042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <c53e8j$2os43j$1@ID-170553.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> >> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:timberwoof-776870.20035007042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <c525mq$cah$1@news.wplus.net>, Xomicron
> >> >> > <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.teranew s.com:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> >> >> >> Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial
> >> >> >> >> activism
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> --- Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> >> >> >> 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on
> >> >> >> >> same---- adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does
> >> >> >> >> not establish a right for homosexuals to parent displaced
> >> >> >> >> children.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> >> >> >> interests of its displaced children to be adopted by
> >> >> >> >> individuals who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the
> >> >> >> >> Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Probably. With their source of new recuits gone, how will they
> >> >> >> swell their ranks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Either you've got ---- for brains or you're liars. You're
> >> >> > certainly spammers. Did you really think you could repeat those
> >> >> > same, tired old discredited babblings about "recruitment" and not
> >> >> > have someone point out your idiocy? Oh, sorry, that was rude.
> >> >> > Well, if you're not ignorant on the subject than you're being
> >> >> > malicious.
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess that explains why a common rallying cry at gay pride parades
> >> >> is "10% is not enough, recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >> >
> >> > Ah, I see. You are a liar. In my years of attending and being in
> >> > pride parades, I've never heard that "rallying cry"
> >>
> >> Typical lying ------.
> >
> > Typical -----for-brains religious lunatic.*
> >
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~generalgayety/pride.html
> >> http://www.xtra.ca/site/toronto2/arch/body630.shtm
> >> http://blog.feelourpain.com/archives/2004_04.html
> >>
> >> Writing in The Advocate, lesbian activist Donna Minkowitz urged her
> >> comrades to "take the offensive for a change, whether the issue is
> >> promiscuity or recruiting the previously straight.... Ten percent is
> >> not enough! Recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >>
> >> This comes from the same people who will claim in the next breath that
> >> homosexuality is a product of "nature" not "nuture."
> >
> > Typical ignorant or malicious homophobe, assuming that all gay people
> > are members of some giant Borg Collective, all thinking the same things.
>
> Moving the goalposts? First you claim that no homosexuals ever shout that
> slogan

Again, you're either stupid or malicious. If you read what I said and
didn't understand it, you're stupid. If you read and understood what I
said, then you're malicious.

> and now you claim that not all of them think that way.
>
> Stay stupid, filthy ------. It's not like you can help it.

I'm leaning to the conclusion that you're not merely ignorant but a
typical malicious and potentially violent homophobe.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B9F1B5D2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> news:timberwoof-CAFA0F.23031609042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
>
> > In article <Xns94C67AEF6B7C1xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> news:timberwoof-421989.20170308042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <c53e8j$2os43j$1@ID-170553.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> >> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:timberwoof-776870.20035007042004@typhoon.sonic.net:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <c525mq$cah$1@news.wplus.net>, Xomicron
> >> >> > <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.teranew s.com:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> >> >> >> Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial
> >> >> >> >> activism
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> --- Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> >> >> >> 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on
> >> >> >> >> same---- adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does
> >> >> >> >> not establish a right for homosexuals to parent displaced
> >> >> >> >> children.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> >> >> >> interests of its displaced children to be adopted by
> >> >> >> >> individuals who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the
> >> >> >> >> Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Probably. With their source of new recuits gone, how will they
> >> >> >> swell their ranks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Either you've got ---- for brains or you're liars. You're
> >> >> > certainly spammers. Did you really think you could repeat those
> >> >> > same, tired old discredited babblings about "recruitment" and not
> >> >> > have someone point out your idiocy? Oh, sorry, that was rude.
> >> >> > Well, if you're not ignorant on the subject than you're being
> >> >> > malicious.
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess that explains why a common rallying cry at gay pride parades
> >> >> is "10% is not enough, recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >> >
> >> > Ah, I see. You are a liar. In my years of attending and being in
> >> > pride parades, I've never heard that "rallying cry"
> >>
> >> Typical lying ------.
> >
> > Typical -----for-brains religious lunatic.*
> >
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~generalgayety/pride.html
> >> http://www.xtra.ca/site/toronto2/arch/body630.shtm
> >> http://blog.feelourpain.com/archives/2004_04.html
> >>
> >> Writing in The Advocate, lesbian activist Donna Minkowitz urged her
> >> comrades to "take the offensive for a change, whether the issue is
> >> promiscuity or recruiting the previously straight.... Ten percent is
> >> not enough! Recruit, recruit, recruit!"
> >>
> >> This comes from the same people who will claim in the next breath that
> >> homosexuality is a product of "nature" not "nuture."
> >
> > Typical ignorant or malicious homophobe, assuming that all gay people
> > are members of some giant Borg Collective, all thinking the same things.
>
> Moving the goalposts? First you claim that no homosexuals ever shout that
> slogan

Again, you're either stupid or malicious. If you read what I said and
didn't understand it, you're stupid. If you read and understood what I
said, then you're malicious.

> and now you claim that not all of them think that way.
>
> Stay stupid, filthy ------. It's not like you can help it.

I'm leaning to the conclusion that you're not merely ignorant but a
typical malicious and potentially violent homophobe.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B38A58F2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:12 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:pfge70hmhuqoft13s8f54927ncbmvj1rgt@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >>>
> >>> And in 1966, in Virginia, blacks could get married to anyone they
> >>> wanted.. as long as they were black.
> >>
> >> Non sequitur.
> >
> > No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> > mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> > on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
>
> Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.

Despite ever-growing evidence to the contrary I will out of politeness
assume that you insist on this arbitrary separation of arguments not out
of malice but merely out of stupidity. Let me draw you a picture.

The United States has long had lots of laws that limit for various
reasons who could marry whom. For many decades in some states black
people were not allowed to marry at all. Then there were laws that
sought to prevent interracial marriages. California was the first state
to repeal those laws. A mixed-race couple from Alabama who went to
California to get married would be arrested and thrown in jail when they
came back. America, the Land of the Free.

Things have gotten better since then, and freedoms have, for the most
part, increased. I have heard of no reports of gay couples getting
arrested after coming home from places such as San Francisco while gay
marriages were being done and getting married.

The point is that the same arguments used to overthrow the miscegenation
laws (that means laws against mixed-race marriage) -- that marriage is a
right to be exercised by the two people involved and that the government
shouldn't arbitrarily decide who can and who can't get married -- are
also being applied to mixed---- marriage laws.

Remove your blinders and have a look at what has happened in other
countries since they legalized gay marriage. Why, several of them have
already, after just a few short years, fallen into moral depravity,
economic ruin, and utter chaos. I'm kidding.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B38A58F2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:12 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:pfge70hmhuqoft13s8f54927ncbmvj1rgt@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >>>
> >>> And in 1966, in Virginia, blacks could get married to anyone they
> >>> wanted.. as long as they were black.
> >>
> >> Non sequitur.
> >
> > No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> > mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> > on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
>
> Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.

Despite ever-growing evidence to the contrary I will out of politeness
assume that you insist on this arbitrary separation of arguments not out
of malice but merely out of stupidity. Let me draw you a picture.

The United States has long had lots of laws that limit for various
reasons who could marry whom. For many decades in some states black
people were not allowed to marry at all. Then there were laws that
sought to prevent interracial marriages. California was the first state
to repeal those laws. A mixed-race couple from Alabama who went to
California to get married would be arrested and thrown in jail when they
came back. America, the Land of the Free.

Things have gotten better since then, and freedoms have, for the most
part, increased. I have heard of no reports of gay couples getting
arrested after coming home from places such as San Francisco while gay
marriages were being done and getting married.

The point is that the same arguments used to overthrow the miscegenation
laws (that means laws against mixed-race marriage) -- that marriage is a
right to be exercised by the two people involved and that the government
shouldn't arbitrarily decide who can and who can't get married -- are
also being applied to mixed---- marriage laws.

Remove your blinders and have a look at what has happened in other
countries since they legalized gay marriage. Why, several of them have
already, after just a few short years, fallen into moral depravity,
economic ruin, and utter chaos. I'm kidding.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B38A58F2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:12 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:pfge70hmhuqoft13s8f54927ncbmvj1rgt@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >>>
> >>> And in 1966, in Virginia, blacks could get married to anyone they
> >>> wanted.. as long as they were black.
> >>
> >> Non sequitur.
> >
> > No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> > mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> > on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
>
> Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.

Despite ever-growing evidence to the contrary I will out of politeness
assume that you insist on this arbitrary separation of arguments not out
of malice but merely out of stupidity. Let me draw you a picture.

The United States has long had lots of laws that limit for various
reasons who could marry whom. For many decades in some states black
people were not allowed to marry at all. Then there were laws that
sought to prevent interracial marriages. California was the first state
to repeal those laws. A mixed-race couple from Alabama who went to
California to get married would be arrested and thrown in jail when they
came back. America, the Land of the Free.

Things have gotten better since then, and freedoms have, for the most
part, increased. I have heard of no reports of gay couples getting
arrested after coming home from places such as San Francisco while gay
marriages were being done and getting married.

The point is that the same arguments used to overthrow the miscegenation
laws (that means laws against mixed-race marriage) -- that marriage is a
right to be exercised by the two people involved and that the government
shouldn't arbitrarily decide who can and who can't get married -- are
also being applied to mixed---- marriage laws.

Remove your blinders and have a look at what has happened in other
countries since they legalized gay marriage. Why, several of them have
already, after just a few short years, fallen into moral depravity,
economic ruin, and utter chaos. I'm kidding.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <Xns94C77B38A58F2xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:12 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:pfge70hmhuqoft13s8f54927ncbmvj1rgt@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> Homosexuals can already get married.
> >>>
> >>> And in 1966, in Virginia, blacks could get married to anyone they
> >>> wanted.. as long as they were black.
> >>
> >> Non sequitur.
> >
> > No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> > mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> > on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
>
> Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.

Despite ever-growing evidence to the contrary I will out of politeness
assume that you insist on this arbitrary separation of arguments not out
of malice but merely out of stupidity. Let me draw you a picture.

The United States has long had lots of laws that limit for various
reasons who could marry whom. For many decades in some states black
people were not allowed to marry at all. Then there were laws that
sought to prevent interracial marriages. California was the first state
to repeal those laws. A mixed-race couple from Alabama who went to
California to get married would be arrested and thrown in jail when they
came back. America, the Land of the Free.

Things have gotten better since then, and freedoms have, for the most
part, increased. I have heard of no reports of gay couples getting
arrested after coming home from places such as San Francisco while gay
marriages were being done and getting married.

The point is that the same arguments used to overthrow the miscegenation
laws (that means laws against mixed-race marriage) -- that marriage is a
right to be exercised by the two people involved and that the government
shouldn't arbitrarily decide who can and who can't get married -- are
also being applied to mixed---- marriage laws.

Remove your blinders and have a look at what has happened in other
countries since they legalized gay marriage. Why, several of them have
already, after just a few short years, fallen into moral depravity,
economic ruin, and utter chaos. I'm kidding.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <dfritzin-5473FA.08254310042004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com>,
David Fritzinger <dfritzin@macNoSpam.com> wrote:

> In article <Xns94C77BE5582A6xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
> Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
> > sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote in news:4077763F.4D05A325@opelc.com:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > d2004xx wrote:
> > >>
> > >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in message
> > >> news:<4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.terane ws.com>...
> > >> > Xomicron wrote:
> > >> > > http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Same---- adoption ban upheld
> > >> > > Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial activism
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > Posted: January 29, 2004
> > >> > > 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> > >> > >
> > >> > > A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on same----
> > >> > > adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does not establish
> > >> > > a right for homosexuals to parent displaced children.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> > >> > > interests of its displaced children to be adopted by individuals
> > >> > > who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the Eleventh Circuit
> > >> > > Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> > >> >
> > >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> > >>
> > >> nope, they'll torch the ------- court and government.
> > >
> > > It is better for a child to have no parents at all...???
> >
> > Better than having "parents" that will use him as a --- toy.
>
> You've really got to learn the fact that homosexual does not equal
> ---------, just as heterosexual does not equal ---------. There are
> pedophiles in both groups.

Dave, Xomicron is a malicious, mean-spirited homophobe. Before this is
over, we're going to hear, once again -- make that seventy-three times
-- every disproven tired old stupid excuse for an argument that has ever
been presented. And since he's malicious and not just stupid, I expect
Xomicron to come up with one or two new strings of words disguised as
arguments. This one has the social skin of a rhinoceros. Logical debate
will have no effect on his beliefs.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html