In article <Xns94C77B09A2361xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j03g70duepps3kdv9rhe64k5h70m2jrlvv@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:08 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:6ige70ln89to48ik47077qccu5rg3etjpo@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>> Lo, many moons past, on 9 Apr 2004 17:06:11 GMT, a stranger called by
> >>> some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> >>> alt.atheism
> >>>
> >>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
> >>>>
> >>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, there is.
> >>
> >> No, there isn't.
> >
> > You snipped this:
> >
> > "It's called the 14th Amendment, and the SCOTUS made it clear that
> > marriage is a fundamental right protected by the 14th."
> >
> > Afraid of the facts?
>
> Your "facts" have nothing to do with same---- marriage.

Again, to the question you seem to be very anxious to avoid, Snubis. How
does the state allowing same---- marriage harm your marriage. I would
assume that no individual religion would be forced to accept same----
marriage, just that the people involved would get the same rights and
obligations as opposite---- married couples. Now, please answer the
question. How on earth does this harm your marriage?

--
Dave Fritzinger

 

In article <Xns94C77B09A2361xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j03g70duepps3kdv9rhe64k5h70m2jrlvv@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:08 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:6ige70ln89to48ik47077qccu5rg3etjpo@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>> Lo, many moons past, on 9 Apr 2004 17:06:11 GMT, a stranger called by
> >>> some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> >>> alt.atheism
> >>>
> >>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
> >>>>
> >>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, there is.
> >>
> >> No, there isn't.
> >
> > You snipped this:
> >
> > "It's called the 14th Amendment, and the SCOTUS made it clear that
> > marriage is a fundamental right protected by the 14th."
> >
> > Afraid of the facts?
>
> Your "facts" have nothing to do with same---- marriage.

Again, to the question you seem to be very anxious to avoid, Snubis. How
does the state allowing same---- marriage harm your marriage. I would
assume that no individual religion would be forced to accept same----
marriage, just that the people involved would get the same rights and
obligations as opposite---- married couples. Now, please answer the
question. How on earth does this harm your marriage?

--
Dave Fritzinger

 

In article <Xns94C77B09A2361xomicron@0.0.0.3>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> news:j03g70duepps3kdv9rhe64k5h70m2jrlvv@4ax.com:
>
> > Lo, many moons past, on 10 Apr 2004 02:47:08 GMT, a stranger called by
> > some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> > alt.atheism
> >
> >> Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >> news:6ige70ln89to48ik47077qccu5rg3etjpo@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>> Lo, many moons past, on 9 Apr 2004 17:06:11 GMT, a stranger called by
> >>> some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told this tale in
> >>> alt.atheism
> >>>
> >>>>> Just not to the person they want to.
> >>>>
> >>>> There's no law that says a person can marry whoever they want.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, there is.
> >>
> >> No, there isn't.
> >
> > You snipped this:
> >
> > "It's called the 14th Amendment, and the SCOTUS made it clear that
> > marriage is a fundamental right protected by the 14th."
> >
> > Afraid of the facts?
>
> Your "facts" have nothing to do with same---- marriage.

Again, to the question you seem to be very anxious to avoid, Snubis. How
does the state allowing same---- marriage harm your marriage. I would
assume that no individual religion would be forced to accept same----
marriage, just that the people involved would get the same rights and
obligations as opposite---- married couples. Now, please answer the
question. How on earth does this harm your marriage?

--
Dave Fritzinger

 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote in news:4077763F.4D05A325@opelc.com:
>
> >
> >
> > d2004xx wrote:
> >>
> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in message
> >> news:<4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.terane ws.com>...
> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> > > http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> > >
> >> > > Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> > > Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial activism
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> > > 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> > >
> >> > > A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on same----
> >> > > adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does not establish
> >> > > a right for homosexuals to parent displaced children.
> >> > >
> >> > > The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> > > interests of its displaced children to be adopted by individuals
> >> > > who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the Eleventh Circuit
> >> > > Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >
> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >>
> >> nope, they'll torch the ------- court and government.
> >
> > It is better for a child to have no parents at all...???
>
> Better than having "parents" that will use him as a --- toy.

I suspect there would be less homosexuals using their
children as --- toys....they would have to go through the
same screening process as male/female couples go through
to adopt....

Please do not tell me that male/female married heterosexuals
do not use children as --- toys...as my life experience shows
differently....I was molested by such a couple at about the
age of seven.....

The only thing I have left of the experience, other then
the memory, is I can not stand skinny females....

I think that all couples should be screened before they are
allowed to have children.....

thank you for listening to my thoughts.....sno

--
How do you call a fly without wings ? A walk !

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote in news:4077763F.4D05A325@opelc.com:
>
> >
> >
> > d2004xx wrote:
> >>
> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in message
> >> news:<4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.terane ws.com>...
> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> > > http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> > >
> >> > > Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> > > Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial activism
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> > > 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> > >
> >> > > A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on same----
> >> > > adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does not establish
> >> > > a right for homosexuals to parent displaced children.
> >> > >
> >> > > The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> > > interests of its displaced children to be adopted by individuals
> >> > > who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the Eleventh Circuit
> >> > > Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >
> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >>
> >> nope, they'll torch the ------- court and government.
> >
> > It is better for a child to have no parents at all...???
>
> Better than having "parents" that will use him as a --- toy.

I suspect there would be less homosexuals using their
children as --- toys....they would have to go through the
same screening process as male/female couples go through
to adopt....

Please do not tell me that male/female married heterosexuals
do not use children as --- toys...as my life experience shows
differently....I was molested by such a couple at about the
age of seven.....

The only thing I have left of the experience, other then
the memory, is I can not stand skinny females....

I think that all couples should be screened before they are
allowed to have children.....

thank you for listening to my thoughts.....sno

--
How do you call a fly without wings ? A walk !

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote in news:4077763F.4D05A325@opelc.com:
>
> >
> >
> > d2004xx wrote:
> >>
> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in message
> >> news:<4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.terane ws.com>...
> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> > > http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> > >
> >> > > Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> > > Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial activism
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> > > 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> > >
> >> > > A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on same----
> >> > > adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does not establish
> >> > > a right for homosexuals to parent displaced children.
> >> > >
> >> > > The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> > > interests of its displaced children to be adopted by individuals
> >> > > who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the Eleventh Circuit
> >> > > Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >
> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >>
> >> nope, they'll torch the ------- court and government.
> >
> > It is better for a child to have no parents at all...???
>
> Better than having "parents" that will use him as a --- toy.

I suspect there would be less homosexuals using their
children as --- toys....they would have to go through the
same screening process as male/female couples go through
to adopt....

Please do not tell me that male/female married heterosexuals
do not use children as --- toys...as my life experience shows
differently....I was molested by such a couple at about the
age of seven.....

The only thing I have left of the experience, other then
the memory, is I can not stand skinny females....

I think that all couples should be screened before they are
allowed to have children.....

thank you for listening to my thoughts.....sno

--
How do you call a fly without wings ? A walk !

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote in news:4077763F.4D05A325@opelc.com:
>
> >
> >
> > d2004xx wrote:
> >>
> >> "Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in message
> >> news:<4c9985cd7b0ca8b99e455da4d7dbb0fe@news.terane ws.com>...
> >> > Xomicron wrote:
> >> > > http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36826
> >> > >
> >> > > Same---- adoption ban upheld
> >> > > Federal court curbs Texas sodomy ruling, decries judicial activism
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Posted: January 29, 2004
> >> > > 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> >> > >
> >> > > A federal appeals court yesterday upheld Florida's ban on same----
> >> > > adoptions, ruling the landmark Texas sodomy case does not establish
> >> > > a right for homosexuals to parent displaced children.
> >> > >
> >> > > The Florida legislature properly judged it is not in the best
> >> > > interests of its displaced children to be adopted by individuals
> >> > > who engage in voluntary homosexual activity, the Eleventh Circuit
> >> > > Court of Appeals in Atlanta said.
> >> >
> >> > I assume the linuxfags will be moving out of Florida.
> >>
> >> nope, they'll torch the ------- court and government.
> >
> > It is better for a child to have no parents at all...???
>
> Better than having "parents" that will use him as a --- toy.

I suspect there would be less homosexuals using their
children as --- toys....they would have to go through the
same screening process as male/female couples go through
to adopt....

Please do not tell me that male/female married heterosexuals
do not use children as --- toys...as my life experience shows
differently....I was molested by such a couple at about the
age of seven.....

The only thing I have left of the experience, other then
the memory, is I can not stand skinny females....

I think that all couples should be screened before they are
allowed to have children.....

thank you for listening to my thoughts.....sno

--
How do you call a fly without wings ? A walk !

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

 

In article <40784005.CCC01305@opelc.com>, sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I think that all couples should be screened before they are
> allowed to have children.....

<snip>

Good idea, _if_ we could trust the government.

 

In article <40784005.CCC01305@opelc.com>, sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I think that all couples should be screened before they are
> allowed to have children.....

<snip>

Good idea, _if_ we could trust the government.

 

In article <40784005.CCC01305@opelc.com>, sno <sno@opelc.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I think that all couples should be screened before they are
> allowed to have children.....

<snip>

Good idea, _if_ we could trust the government.